Locke's point on view about empiristics Assignment

Lockes point on view about empiristics - Assignment ExampleExplain why Berkeley maintains that if empiricists go through these ideas seriously, Lockes account actually leads to radical doubts about the existence of the material world. What solution to this problem does Berkeley think that empiricists should convey? Berkeleys solution, however, is widely seen to be highly problematic. Which of these two problems---the (alleged) problems facing Locke or Berkeleys solution to these problems---seems to be the most disconfirming or difficult problem facing empiricism? Why? Critically defend your position. The empiricist claim of Locke proposes that knowledge only comes from experience and feeling while the rationalists asserts that reason is already an innate attribute and is already previously present in Descartes Cartesian proof. Locke posits that the human consciousness evolves and therefore starts as an empty mind or a tabula rasa. It continuously evolves with experience, learnin g and sensation which are the sources of our ideas. The rationalists like Rene Descartes however, presupposes that reason is already inherent in man. It is already there even before he or she attempts to evolve or make a conscious effort to even think. For Descartes, the mere exercise of thinking is already a validation that single exists. Even the process of doubting mavins existence, in Descartes perspective, is already a proof that one exists due to the sheer exercise of thinking.